Before I get to some of the stirring quotes from Daniel Webster, let me share some stirring news of my own. I doubt it will be quoted like Webster, Clay, and Calhoun, but it's almost as meaningful for me. I signed a contract yesterday for the publication of another one of my short stories. I finished and submitted it last month. It will come out in an anthology early next month, and I''ll be sure to post a cover picture and link.
In addition, I'm about to finish another short story and submit it for consideration. I'm down to the final thousand words. I had a wrestle before the computer screen about how to construct a satisfying ending from the materials I brought to the project through the telling of the story to the two-thirds point. From that point the story must reach an exciting confrontation, which was already in progress, and resolve the tension the unanswered questions and conflict created. It's always the latter that is tougher to handle. It's easy to create questions, uncertainty, and tension. Resolving that is where too many stories and story tellers fall short. For further info, check out my posts on my writing philosophy of The Trauma, The Drama, and The Dream, or my presentation on the subject.
Fun Fact:
I'm currently reading Fergus M. Bordewich's book America's Great Debate: Henry Clay, Stephen A. Douglas and the Compromise the Preserved the Union. The quotes below are from the Congressional Record as given in the book. So far, this book is excellent. It presents a fascinating account of the men and circumstances surrounding the Congressional debates of 1850 concerning the admission of Texas, and states from the territory gained in the war with Mexico. The slavery issue yawned like a great gulf that separated the factions in congress and threatened to divide the nation. After Henry Clay had presented his 8 point proposal for a compromise, and it had been debated and denounced by the extreme wings of the major factions. Daniel Webster spoke for four hours in support of the proposed compromise in a way that only he could do. It made him enemies all around and did not resolve the matter. Here are a few portions of it:
“In all such disputes, there will sometimes be found men with whom everything is absolute; absolutely right, or absolutely wrong. They deal with morals as with mathematics; and they think what is right may be distinguished from what is wrong with the precision of an algebraic equation. They have, therefore, none too much charity towards others who differ from them. They are apt, too, to think that nothing is good but what is perfect, and that there are no compromises or modifications to be made in consideration of difference of opinion or in deference to other men’s judgment. If their perspicacious judgment enables them to detect a spot on the face of the sun, they think that a good reason why the sun should be struck down from heaven. They prefer the chance of running into utter darkness to living in heavenly light, if that heavenly light be not absolutely without any imperfection.”
“I hear with distress and anguish the word ‘secession... Secession! Peaceable secession! Who is so foolish, I beg everyone’s pardon, as to expect to see any such thing? Who sees these states, now revolving in harmony around a common centre, and expects to see them quit their places and fly off without convulsion, may look the next hour to see heavenly bodies rush from their spheres, and jostle against each other in the realms of space, without causing the wreck of the universe. Peaceable secession is an utter impossibility. Is the great Constitution under which we live, covering the whole country, is it to be thawed and melted away by secession, as the snows on the mountain melt under the influence of a vernal sun, disappear almost unobserved, and run off? No, sir! No, sir! I will not state what might produce the disruption of the Union; but, sir, I see as plainly as I see the sun in heaven what that disruption itself must produce; I see that it must produce war. “Peaceable secession! Where is the line to be drawn? What states are to secede? What is to remain American? What am I to be? An American no longer? Am I to become a sectional man, a local man, a separatist, with no country in common with the gentlemen who sit around me here, or who fill the other house of Congress? Heaven forbid! Where is the flag of the republic to remain? Where is the eagle still to tower? Or is he to cower, and shrink, and fall to the ground? What is to become of the army? What is to become of the Navy? What is to become of the public lands? How is each of the thirty states to defend itself? To break up this great government! To dismember this glorious country! To astonish Europe with an act of folly such as Europe for two centuries has never beheld in any government or any people! No, sir! No, sir! There will be no secession!”
"[L]et us come out into the light of day. Let us not be pigmies in a case that calls for men. Let us make our generation one of the strongest and brightest links in that golden chain which is destined, I fondly believe, to grapple the people of all the states to this Constitution for ages to come.”
______________________
There are few things that ring so true with regard to modern problems as the wise words of earlier statesmen. Unfortunately, those on opposite sides both attempt to bend those words to serve their own cause. Compromise held the nation together until those sectional divisions finally burst the frail seams of the agreement. Eventually--especially when one side's positions become more and more extreme, running away from the middle ground rather than toward a compromise position, the rift must open and swallow both progress and the hopes for a peaceful solution.
Speaking of solutions to difficult questions: Check out Truth in Flames for some lively debate about independence amid fire and fury.
No comments:
Post a Comment